HIV Surveillance in a Large, Community-Based Study: Results from the Pilot Study of Project Accept (HIV Prevention Trials Network 043)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Piwowar-Manning, E.
dc.contributor.author Fiamma, A.
dc.contributor.author Laeyendecker, O.
dc.contributor.author Michal Kulich, M.
dc.contributor.author Donnell, D.
dc.contributor.author Szekeres, G.
dc.contributor.author Robins-Morris, L.
dc.contributor.author Mullis, C.E.
dc.contributor.author Ana Vallari, A.
dc.contributor.author Hackett, J.Jr
dc.contributor.author Mastro, T.D.
dc.contributor.author Gray, G.
dc.contributor.author Richter, L.
dc.contributor.author Alexandre, M.W.
dc.contributor.author Chariyalertsak, S.
dc.contributor.author Chingono, A.
dc.contributor.author Sweat, M.
dc.contributor.author Coates, T.
dc.contributor.author Eshleman, S.H.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-06T13:04:23Z
dc.date.available 2013-02-06T13:04:23Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2334-11-251
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/175
dc.description.abstract Background: Project Accept is a community randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of community mobilization, mobile testing, same-day results, and post-test support for the prevention of HIV infection in Thailand, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. We evaluated the accuracy of in-country HIV rapid testing and determined HIV prevalence in the Project Accept pilot study. Methods: Two HIV rapid tests were performed in parallel in local laboratories. If the first two rapid tests were discordant (one reactive, one non-reactive), a third HIV rapid test or enzyme immunoassay was performed. Samples were designated HIV NEG if the first two tests were non-reactive, HIV DISC if the first two tests were discordant, and HIV POS if the first two tests were reactive. Samples were re-analyzed in the United States using a panel of laboratory tests. Results: HIV infection status was correctly determined based on-in country testing for 2,236 (99.5%) of 2,247 participants [7 (0.37%) of 1,907 HIV NEG samples were HIV-positive; 2 (0.63%) of 317 HIV POS samples were HIV-negative; 2 (8.3%) of 24 HIV DISC samples were incorrectly identified as HIV-positive based on the in-country tie-breaker test]. HIV prevalence was: Thailand: 0.6%, Tanzania: 5.0%, Zimbabwe 14.7%, Soweto South Africa: 19.4%, Vulindlela, South Africa: 24.4%, (overall prevalence: 14.4%). Conclusions: In-country testing based on two HIV rapid tests correctly identified the HIV infection status for 99.5% of study participants; most participants with discordant HIV rapid tests were not infected. HIV prevalence varied considerably across the study sites (range: 0.6% to 24.4%). en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC Infectious Diseases 2011, 11:251
dc.subject HIV en_GB
dc.subject Surveillance en_GB
dc.title HIV Surveillance in a Large, Community-Based Study: Results from the Pilot Study of Project Accept (HIV Prevention Trials Network 043) en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account