Cost-effectiveness of live oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ruhago, M.G.
dc.contributor.author Ngalesoni, N.F.
dc.contributor.author Robberstad, B.
dc.contributor.author Norheim, F.O.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-14T06:58:03Z
dc.date.available 2016-09-14T06:58:03Z
dc.date.issued 2015-04
dc.identifier.citation Ruhago GM, Ngalesoni FN, Robberstad B, Norheim OF. Cost-effectiveness of live oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Tanzania. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2015 Apr 28;13(1):1. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2024
dc.description.abstract Background: Globally, diarrhoea is the second leading cause of morbidity and mortality, responsible for the annual loss of about 10% of the total global childhood disease burden. In Tanzania, Rotavirus infection is the major cause of severe diarrhoea and diarrhoeal mortality in children under five years. Immunisation can reduce the burden, and Tanzania added rotavirus vaccine to its national immunisation programme in January 2013. This study explores the cost effectiveness of introducing rotavirus vaccine within the Tanzania Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Methods: We quantified all health system implementation costs, including programme costs, to calculate the cost effectiveness of adding rotavirus immunisation to EPI and the existing provision of diarrhoea treatment (oral rehydration salts and intravenous fluids) to children. We used ingredients and step down costing methods. Cost and coverage data were collected in 2012 at one urban and one rural district hospital and a health centre in Tanzania. We used Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) as the outcome measure and estimated incremental costs and health outcomes using a Markov transition model with weekly cycles up to a five-year time horizon. Results: The average unit cost per vaccine dose at 93% coverage is US$ 8.4, with marked difference between the urban facility US$ 5.2; and the rural facility US$ 9.8. RV1 vaccine added to current diarrhoea treatment is highly cost effective compared to diarrhoea treatment given alone, with incremental cost effectiveness ratio of US$ 112 per DALY averted, varying from US$ 80–218 in sensitivity analysis. The intervention approaches a 100% probability of being cost effective at a much lower level of willingness-to-pay than the US$609 per capita Tanzania gross domestic product (GDP). Conclusions: The combination of rotavirus immunisation with diarrhoea treatment is likely to be cost effective when willingness to pay for health is higher than USD 112 per DALY. Universal coverage of the vaccine will accelerate progress towards achievement of the child health Millennium Development Goals. en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher Beo med central en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries Ruhago et al. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (2015) 13:7;10.1186/s12962-015-0033-0
dc.subject Cost en_GB
dc.subject Cost-effectiveness en_GB
dc.subject Rotavirus en_GB
dc.subject Vaccine en_GB
dc.subject Tanzania en_GB
dc.title Cost-effectiveness of live oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Tanzania en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account