Midwives’ intrapartum monitoring process and management resulting in emergency referrals in Tanzania: a qualitative study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shimoda, K.
dc.contributor.author Leshabari, S.
dc.contributor.author Horiuchi, S.
dc.contributor.author Shimpuku, Y.
dc.contributor.author Tashiro, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-09-14T07:06:07Z
dc.date.available 2016-09-14T07:06:07Z
dc.date.issued 2015-10
dc.identifier.citation Shimoda K, Leshabari S, Horiuchi S, Shimpuku Y, Tashiro J. Midwives’ intrapartum monitoring process and management resulting in emergency referrals in Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015 Oct 8;15(1):1. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2048
dc.description.abstract Background: In the United Republic of Tanzania, the maternal mortality ratio, and neonatal mortality rate have remained high for the last 10 years. It is well documented that many complications of pregnancy are avoidable by providing skilled midwifery care during and immediately after childbirth. However, there have been delays in providing timely and necessary obstetric interventions, most likely due to lack of proper monitoring during labor. Yet, there has been little research concerning how midwives monitor the process of childbirth. Therefore, this study aimed to describe how midwives monitored and managed the process of childbirth to achieve early consulting and timely referral to obstetricians. Methods: The design was qualitative and descriptive, using data from comprehensive semi-structured interviews of midwives. The interviews were conducted at one hospital and one health center in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania’s largest city. Eleven participants were purposively recruited and interviewed about their experiences managing complicated intrapartum cases. After the interviews, data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Derived from the data were three activity phases: initial encounter, monitoring, and acting. During these phases, midwives noticed danger signs, identified problems, revised and confirmed initial problem identification, and organized for medical intervention or referral. The timing of taking action was different for each midwife and depended on the nature of the prolonged and obstructed labor case. Conclusions: For the majority of midwives, the processing of assessments and judgments was brief and without reflection, and only a few midwives took time to continue to monitor the labor after the initial identification of problems and before taking actions. To make a final judgment that the labor was becoming prolonged or obstructed, midwives should consider taking time to review and synthesize all their findings. en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher Bio med central en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries Shimoda et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth;10.1186/s12884-015-0691-0
dc.subject Quality of care en_GB
dc.subject Decision making en_GB
dc.subject Clinical judgment en_GB
dc.subject Childbirth en_GB
dc.subject Tanzania en_GB
dc.title Midwives’ intrapartum monitoring process and management resulting in emergency referrals in Tanzania: a qualitative study en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account