Review of post operative notes after caesarian section at Muhimbili national hospital

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pierre, N.M.J.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-13T12:01:55Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-13T12:01:55Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Review of post operative notes after caesarian section at Muhimbili national hospital. Dar es salaam: Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dpsvr.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2150
dc.description.abstract Post-operative notes (PON) documentation following caesarean section (C/S) is crucial for subsequent management of patients after the surgery. No study has ever been done in our setting to assess the contents of PON. The aim of this study was to evaluate the completeness of written PON from C/S at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). Methodology One thousands two hundred PON were reviewed against pre developed criteria. Each note was assessed for completeness of the criteria developed. The criteria were developed by reviewing literature and discussion with doctors in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The persons who performed the C/S were identified, either registrars/residents or specialists. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 and results were presented as frequency tables. Results Among 1200 PON reviewed,833 were emergencies and 367 were elective C/S. Registrars/residents wrote 68.5% of the PON, and specialists wrote 30% of them. The main indication for C/S was previous scar (26.2%) followed by CPD/obstructed labor/big baby (17.5%). Four post operative notes (0.3%) were complete. Four criteria (indication of C/S, intravenous antibiotics, pain management and intravenous fluids) came out to be present in all PON. The criteria with deficiencies varied from 99.8% for the highest to 2% for the lowest. Difference in writing PON between registrars/residents and specialists were noted in: washing and draping, type of uterine closure, suture used for uterine closure, swab and instrument count, appearances of fallopian tubes and ovaries. P-value for those elements was< 0.001. Conclusion Few PON met the agreed criteria. Differences of contents of the notes between registrars/residents and specialists were noted in some of the criteria. There is a need for a standard national guideline for operative notes documentation. A checklist can also be available in theatre, to remind surgeons on what type of information is needed to help in patient’s care post surgery. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences en_US
dc.subject Post-operative notes (PON) en_US
dc.subject Caesarean section (C/S) en_US
dc.subject Maternal health en_US
dc.title Review of post operative notes after caesarian section at Muhimbili national hospital en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account