Abstract:
Background
Availability of correct and adequate information about medicines is an important aspect in
ensuring rational use of medicines and hence facilitating safety and expected efficacy of
medicines during therapy. Package inserts have proven to be a good source of information
to the prescribers and patients whereby they have been useful in highlighting important
information pertaining proper use and handling of the medicines. The present study was
aimed at establishing the extent to which package inserts of medicines circulating on the
markets of the East African Community (EAC) Partner States conform to medicines information
requirements as established in the harmonized guidelines as well as national
guidelines.
Methods
A total of 99 package inserts from six (6) types of medicines namely Albendazole,
Artemether/Lumefantrine (ALu), Ciprofloxacin, Paracetamol, Amoxicillin and Metronidazole
were purposefully collected from three EAC Partner States: Kenya, Tanzania and
Uganda. The medicines were selected based on their indications as first line treatments,
high rates of utilization within the medicines supply system and their positions in treatment
of diseases of public importance across EAC Partner States. The inserts were evaluated
on the availability of information regarding fifteen (15) parameters as extracted from the
EAC harmonized guidelines for registration of medicines. Moreover, comparisons were
made between the percentage conformity of the branded versus generic products, markets
from which the samples were collected, origin of the manufacturer and type of
medicine.Results
Majority (93.9±100%) of the medicines' package inserts highly conformed to the inclusion of
the information regarding the description and composition of the medications, indications,
dosage and methods of administration, warnings and precautions, contraindications and
storage conditions. However, the information on handling and disposal, container package
description, excipients used, clinical pharmacology of the medicines, and directions regarding
overdose ranked the least in conformance with conformity ranging from 13.1±52.5%.
The parameter with the lowest observed percentage conformity among the branded
products scored 50% as compared to 10.8% among the generic products. Moreover, there
was no significant difference (P<0.05) in the percentage conformity of the package inserts
collected from each of the three Partner States as compared to the average from studied
medicines. A generally good conformity was observed among medicines manufactured by
European based manufacturers as compared to those based in Asia and EAC Partner
States. In addition, PIs of Albendazole, Ciprofloxacin, Amoxicillin and Artemether/Lumefantrine
did show overall high conformity across most of the product information requirements.
Conclusion
Our study revealed the existence of a significant number of medicinal products circulating
on the markets of EAC Partner States without necessary compliance with all product information
requirements. We therefore recommend that NMRAs ensure thorough pre-market
assessment of product information as well as strengthening their post marketing surveillance
to ensure that medicines circulating on the market comply to medicines information
requirements at all times. Emphasis should also be given to manufacturers on the importance
of inclusion of appropriate and adequate product information for the safety of patients,
including advocating for inclusion of patient-friendly and easy to understand medicines
information.