Is time of birth a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome? A hospital-based cross sectional study in a low-resource setting, Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kidanto, H.
dc.contributor.author Mgaya, A.
dc.contributor.author Hinju, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-07T08:05:32Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-07T08:05:32Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Mgaya, A., Hinju, J. and Kidanto, H., 2017. Is time of birth a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome? A hospital-based cross-sectional study in a low-resource setting, Tanzania. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 17(1), p.184. en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc 10.1186/s12884-017-1358-9
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2300
dc.description.abstract Background: Inconsistent evidence of a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes during off-hours compared to office hours necessitated a search for clear evidence of an association between time of birth and adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital compared perinatal outcomes across three working shifts over 24 h. A checklist and a questionnaire were used to record parturients’ socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics, mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes, including 5th minute Apgar score, and early neonatal mortality. Risks of adverse outcomes included maternal age, parity, referral status and mode of delivery, and were assessed for their association with time of delivery and prevalence of fresh stillbirth as a proxy for poor perinatal outcome at a significance level of p = 0.05. Results: Off-hour deliveries were nearly twice as likely to occur during the night shift (odds ratio (OR), 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.50–1.72), but were unlikely during the evening shift (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45–0.71) (all p < 0. 001). Neonatal distress (O.R, 1.48, 95% CI; 1.07–2.04, p = 0.02), early neonatal deaths (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07–2.72, p = 0. 03) and fresh stillbirths (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31–2.90, p = 0.001) were more significantly associated with deliveries occurring during night shifts compared to evening and morning shifts. However, fresh stillbirths occurring during the night shift were independently associated with antenatal admission from clinics or wards, referral from another hospital, and abnormal breech delivery (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3–2.9, p = 0.001, for fresh stillbirths; OR, 5.0; 95% CI 1.7–8.3, p < 0.001, for antenatal admission; OR, 95% CI, 1.1–2.9, p < 0.001, for referral form another hospital; and OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.02–2.6, p = 0.004, for abnormal breech deliveries). Conclusion: Off-hours deliveries, particularly during the night shift, were significantly associated with higher proportions of adverse perinatal outcomes, including low Apgar score, early neonatal death and fresh stillbirth, compared to morning and evening shifts. Labour room admissions from antenatal wards, referrals from another hospital and abnormal breech delivery were independent risk factors for poor perinatal outcome, particularly fresh stillbirths. Keywords: Perinatal outcome, Time of birth, Quality of care, Low-resource setting en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BiomedCentral en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC pregnancy and childbirth,;17(1), p.184
dc.subject Perinatal outcome en_US
dc.subject Time of birth en_US
dc.subject Quality of care en_US
dc.subject Low-resource setting en_US
dc.title Is time of birth a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome? A hospital-based cross sectional study in a low-resource setting, Tanzania en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account