Cost-Effectiveness of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for Improving Quality of Antenatal and Childbirth Care in Rural Tanzania: An Intervention Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Saronga, H.P.
dc.contributor.author Duysburgh, E.
dc.contributor.author Massawe, S.
dc.contributor.author Ayindenaba, M.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-07T08:20:41Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-07T08:20:41Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Saronga, H.P., Duysburgh, E., Massawe, S., Dalaba, M.A., Wangwe, P., Sukums, F., Leshabari, M., Blank, A., Sauerborn, R. and Loukanova, S., 2017. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic clinical decision support system for improving quality of antenatal and childbirth care in rural Tanzania: an intervention study. BMC health services research, 17(1), p.537. en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc 10.1186/s12913-017-2457-z
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2308
dc.description.abstract Background: QUALMAT project aimed at improving quality of maternal and newborn care in selected health care facilities in three African countries. An electronic clinical decision support system was implemented to support providers comply with established standards in antenatal and childbirth care. Given that health care resources are limited and interventions differ in their potential impact on health and costs (efficiency), this study aimed at assessing cost-effectiveness of the system in Tanzania. Methods: This was a quantitative pre- and post- intervention study involving 6 health centres in rural Tanzania. Cost information was collected from health provider’s perspective. Outcome information was collected through observation of the process of maternal care. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for antenatal and childbirth care were calculated with testing of four models where the system was compared to the conventional paper-based approach to care. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether changes in process quality score and cost would impact on cost-effectiveness ratios. Results: Economic cost of implementation was 167,318 USD, equivalent to 27,886 USD per health center and 43 USD per contact. The system improved antenatal process quality by 4.5% and childbirth care process quality by 23. 3% however these improvements were not statistically significant. Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the system were 2469 USD and 338 USD per 1% change in process quality for antenatal and childbirth care respectively. Cost-effectiveness of the system was sensitive to assumptions made on costs and outcomes. Conclusions: Although the system managed to marginally improve individual process quality variables, it did not have significant improvement effect on the overall process quality of care in the short-term. A longer duration of usage of the electronic clinical decision support system and retention of staff are critical to the efficiency of the system and can reduce the invested resources. Realization of gains from the system requires effective implementation and an enabling healthcare system. Trial registration: Registered clinical trial at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01409824). Registered May 2009. Keywords: Clinical decision support system, Pharmacoeconomics, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Antenatal care, Childbirth care, Rural health care, Medical health information technology, Tanzania en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BiomedCentral en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMC health services research,;17(1), p.537.
dc.subject Clinical decision support system en_US
dc.subject Pharmacoeconomics en_US
dc.subject Cost-effectiveness analysis en_US
dc.subject Tanzania en_US
dc.title Cost-Effectiveness of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for Improving Quality of Antenatal and Childbirth Care in Rural Tanzania: An Intervention Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account