Midwives’ Respect and Disrespect of Women during Facility-Based Childbirth in Urban Tanzania: A Qualitative Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Leshabari, S.
dc.contributor.author Shimoda, K.
dc.contributor.author Horiuchi, S.
dc.contributor.author Shimpuku, Y.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-07T08:31:30Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-07T08:31:30Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Shimoda, K., Horiuchi, S., Leshabari, S. and Shimpuku, Y., 2018. Midwives’ respect and disrespect of women during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania: a qualitative study. Reproductive health, 15(1), p.8. en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc 10.1186/s12978-017-0447-6
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2314
dc.description.abstract Background: Over the last two decades, facility-based childbirths in Tanzania have only minimally increased by 10% partly because of healthcare providers’ disrespect and abuse (D&A) of women during childbirth. Although numerous studies have substantiated women’s experience of D&A during childbirth by healthcare providers, few have focused on how D&A occurred during the midwives’ actual care. This study aimed to describe from actual observations the respectful and disrespectful care received by women from midwives during their labor period in two hospitals in urban Tanzania. Methods: This descriptive qualitative study involved naturalistic observation of two health facilities in urban Tanzania. Fourteen midwives were purposively recruited for the one-on-one shadowing of their care of 24 women in labor from admission to the fourth stage of labor. Observations of their midwifery care were analyzed using content analysis. Results: All the 14 midwives showed both respectful and disrespectful care and some practices that have not been explicated in previous reports of women’s experiences. For respectful care, five categories were identified: 1) positive interactions between midwives and women, 2) respect for women’s privacy, 3) provision of safe and timely midwifery care for delivery, 4) active engagement in women’s labor process, and 5) encouragement of the motherbaby relationship. For disrespectful care, five categories were recognized: 1) physical abuse, 2) psychological abuse, 3) non-confidential care, 4) non-consented care, and 5) abandonment of care. Two additional categories emerged from the unprioritized and disorganized nursing and midwifery management: 1) lack of accountability and 2) unethical clinical practices. Conclusions: Both respectful care and disrespectful care of midwives were observed in the two health facilities in urban Tanzania. Several types of physical and psychological abuse that have not been reported were observed. Weak nursing and midwifery management was found to be a contributor to the D&A of women. To promote respectful care of women, pre-service and in-service trainings, improvement of working conditions and environment, empowering pregnant women, and strengthening health policies are crucial. Keywords: Disrespect and abuse, Mistreatment, Quality of care, Facility-based childbirth, Respectful care, Humanized childbirth, Tanzania. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BiomwedCentral en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Reproductive health,;15(1), p.8.
dc.subject Disrespect and abuse en_US
dc.subject Mistreatment en_US
dc.subject Quality of care en_US
dc.subject Facility-based childbirth en_US
dc.subject Tanzania en_US
dc.title Midwives’ Respect and Disrespect of Women during Facility-Based Childbirth in Urban Tanzania: A Qualitative Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account