Comparison of malaria treatment Outcome of generic and innovator’s Anti‑malarial drugs containing artemether– Lumefantrine combination in the management Of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian Children

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kilonzi, M.
dc.contributor.author Minzi, O.
dc.contributor.author Mutagonda, R.
dc.contributor.author Sasi, P.
dc.contributor.author Kamuhabwa, A.
dc.contributor.author Aklillu3, E.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-05T08:16:33Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-05T08:16:33Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Kilonzi, M., Minzi, O., Mutagonda, R., Sasi, P., Kamuhabwa, A. and Aklillu, E., 2019. Comparison of malaria treatment outcome of generic and innovator’s anti-malarial drugs containing artemether–lumefantrine combination in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian children. Malaria journal, 18(1), p.133. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2396
dc.description.abstract Background: In 2006, artemether–lumefantrine (ALU), specifcally Coartem® (Novartis Pharma AG, Basel Switzerland), was approved as the frst-line drug for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Tanzania. Due to poor availability and afordability of the innovator’s product, the government of Tanzania in 2013 prequalifed the use of generic antimalarial drugs, whereby Artefan® (Ajanta, Pharma Ltd, India) was the frst to be approved. Methods: This was an equivalence prospective study that aimed to determine the efectiveness of anti-malarial generic Artefan® in comparison with innovator’s product Coartem®. Patients aged 6 to 59 months with uncomplicated malaria were recruited and randomized to either receive Artefan® or Coartem® as a control. Participants were required to revisit clinic fve times as follow up to monitor treatment outcome as per World Health Organization recommendations. On each visit, thick and thin blood smears, dried blood spot (DBS), haemoglobin concentrations and auxiliary temperature were performed and documented. Results: Out of 230 recruited participants, 200 met inclusion criteria and were randomized equally to receive Artefan® and Coartem®. The overall PCR uncorrected cure rate were 80% for Artefan® and 75% for Coartem® (p=0.44). Adequate clinical and parasitological response were 82.1% for Artefan® and 74.7% for Coartem®, and there was no early treatment failure (ETF) observed in both arms of treatment. Both drugs showed excellent early parasite clearance, whereby no participants had peripheral parasitaemia on day 3. Late clinical failures (LCF) were 3.6% for Artefan® and 1.3% for Coartem® (p=0.31), and late parasitological failure (LPF) were 15.4% for Artefan® and 22.7% for Coartem® (p=0.32). Mean haemoglobin (g/dl) concentrations observed on day 28 were higher compared to day 0 for both drugs, although not statistically signifcant. Only one (1.3%) participant on Artefan® had temperature≥37.5 °C on day 3. Conclusion: The fndings of this study indicate that both Artefan® and Coartem® are equivalent and efective in the management of uncomplicated malaria amongst children in the Coast part of Tanzania. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This study was funded by Sida through Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Subprogram at Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences. Sida-MUHAS Malaria and NTD subprogram. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries . Malaria journal;18(1), p.133
dc.subject Artefan en_US
dc.subject Coartem en_US
dc.subject Effectiveness en_US
dc.title Comparison of malaria treatment Outcome of generic and innovator’s Anti‑malarial drugs containing artemether– Lumefantrine combination in the management Of uncomplicated malaria amongst Tanzanian Children en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account