A family-oriented antenatal education program to improve birth preparedness and maternal-infant birth outcomes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shimpuku, Y.
dc.contributor.author Madeni, Frida E.
dc.contributor.author Horiuchi, Shigeko
dc.contributor.author Kubota, Kazumi
dc.contributor.author Leshabari, Sebalda C.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-20T08:16:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-20T08:16:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Shimpuku, Y., Madeni, F.E., Horiuchi, S., Kubota, K. and Leshabari, S.C., 2019. A family-oriented antenatal education program to improve birth preparedness and maternal-infant birth outcomes: A cross sectional evaluation study. Reproductive health, 16(1), p.107. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2428
dc.description.abstract In Tanzania, the information on Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness is insufficiently provided to pregnant women and their families. The aim of this study was to evaluate the maternal and infant outcomes of a family-oriented antenatal group education program that promotes Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness in rural Tanzania. Methods: Pregnant women and families were enrolled in a program about nutrition and exercise, danger signs, and birth preparedness. The cross sectional survey was conducted one year later to evaluate if the participants of the program (intervention group) were different from those who did not participate (control group) with respect to birth-preparedness and maternal and infant outcomes. Results: A total of 194 participants (intervention group, 50; control group, 144) were analyzed. For Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness, the intervention group participants knew a health facility in case of emergency (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.39–6.97); arranged accompaniment to go to a health facility for birth (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.17–5.60); decided the birthplace with or by the pregnant women (OR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.44–6.70); and attended antenatal clinic more than four times (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.20–4.78). For birth outcomes, the intervention group had less bleeding or seizure during labour and birth (OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.13–0.58); fewer Caesarean sections (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07–0.36); and less neonatal complications (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13–0.60). Conclusions: The four variables were significantly better in the intervention group, i.e., identifying a health facility for emergencies, family accompaniment for facility birth, antenatal visits, and involvement of women in decision-making, which may be key factors for improving birth outcome variables. Having identified these key factors, male involvement and healthy pregnant lives should be emphasized in antenatal education to reduce pregnancy and childbirth complications. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ;10.1186/s12978-019-0776-8
dc.subject Pregnancy en_US
dc.subject Childbirth en_US
dc.subject Birth preparedness en_US
dc.subject Antenatal education en_US
dc.subject Male involvement en_US
dc.subject Africa en_US
dc.title A family-oriented antenatal education program to improve birth preparedness and maternal-infant birth outcomes en_US
dc.title.alternative A cross sectional evaluation study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account