dc.description.abstract |
Background; Anaesthesia providers worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia due to the
availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of
waste anaesthesia gases. The routine practice of low flow Anaesthesia offers several
advantages, including preservation of heat and humidity, reduced expenses of inhalational
agents and reduction of theatre and environment pollution. Well-equipped Workstation and
Stringent monitoring with Capnography, Oxygen and Agent analysers are mandatory for safe
conduct of low flow anaesthesia. In most developing countries Low Flow Anaesthesia is still
underutilized due to lack of monitoring equipments and sufficient knowledge on Low Flow
Anaesthesia. Tanzania appears to have a paucity of studies on the prevailing practice pattern of
fresh gas flow and volatile agents choices.
Objective; The study aimed at assessing the practice of low flow anaesthesia and volatile
agents choices among anaesthesia providers at Muhimbili national hospital and Muhimbili
orthopaedic institute.
Methodology; The study was a hospital based descriptive cross sectional study that was
conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital and Muhimbili orthopaedic institute, involving 158
anaesthesia providers working in all operating theatre from July 2019 to February 2020.
Approval for the study was granted by Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
ethical committee. A Validated Structured questionnaire and checklist was used to collect
information from anaesthesia providers and monitors availability. Data obtained included
demographic, practice setting of Low flow anaesthesia, Availability of workstations,
scavenging systems, monitoring equipments, breathing systems, Volatile agents routinely used
and preferred Agent. Data were analysed using the IBM Statistical package for social science‘s
version 23.0 and Using Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test for some of
categorical data. P value < 0.05 was considered statically significant. Results; in this study there were 158 Anaesthesia providers working in different operating
room and intensive care according to duty schedule. The Prevailing practice pattern was high
flow anaesthesia.
Routine practice of Low flow anaesthesia was 27.2%, however, only 6% used fresh gas flow
of 1l/min – 500mls/min complying with the actual meaning of low flow anaesthesia.
Anaesthesia providers with > 10 years of experience and from Muhimbili National Hospital
had the highest proportion of practice of low flow anaesthesia. There was a paucity of
monitoring equipments and some were nonfunctional. All anaesthesia providers had
workstations and only 2.3% displayed Minimum Alveolar concentration (MAC) values, 79.1%
respondents worked in theatre rooms with functioning scavenging systems, 55.8% used
capnography, 6.9% monitored inspiratory Oxygen and none of anaesthesia providers used
Bispectral and Agent Analyzers.
Isoflurane was the most routinely used inhalational agents (100%) followed by Sevoflurane
(69%), then Halothane (32%). Sevoflurane was the most preferred (55.7%), followed by
Isoflurane (42.4%), Halothane (1.9%). Desflurane was not available in these hospitals.
Conclusion; Low flow anaesthesia is seldom practiced despite having strong evidence of
attractive advantages in medical practice and ergonomics. Availability of Sophisticated
workstation and recommended monitoring equipments for volatile agents and other
anaesthesia gas is still a problem within the studied hospitals. Isoflurane is the routinely
used volatile anaesthetics; sevoflurane availability is restricted, however a most
preferred inhalational Agent. Currently Halothane is occasionally used at Muhimbili
hospital and desflurane still not available in all hospitals involved in this study.
Recommendations; Low flow anaesthesia basic principles and technical preconditions
should be well taught to all anaesthesia providers. Intensify LFA training during
residency and nurse anaesthesia training, Initiate protocols/ codes for LFA and start to
implement it in our area. Improve availability of respiratory gas monitors and update
our anaesthesia Machines. Further study need to be done on cost analysis of inhalational
agent use and knowledge assessment on LFA. |
en_US |