Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania:

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Straneo, M
dc.contributor.author Benova, L
dc.contributor.author Hanson, C
dc.contributor.author Fogliati, P
dc.contributor.author Pembe, A. B
dc.contributor.author Smekens, T
dc.contributor.author van den Akker, T
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-21T11:56:29Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-21T11:56:29Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Straneo, Manuela, Lenka Benova, Claudia Hanson, Piera Fogliati, Andrea B. Pembe, Tom Smekens, and Thomas Van Den Akker. "Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: analysis of the 2015–16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey." Health policy and planning 36, no. 9 (2021): 1428-1440 en_US
dc.identifier.other https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab079
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3178
dc.description.abstract Proportions of facility births are increasing throughout sub-Saharan Africa, but obstetric services vary within the health system. In Tanzania, advanced management of childbirth complications (comprehensive emergency obstetric care) is offered in hospitals, while in frontline, primary health care (PHC) facilities (health centres and dispensaries) mostly only routine childbirth care is available. With over half (54%) of rural births in facilities, we hypothesized the presence of socio-economic inequity in hospital-based childbirth uptake in rural Tanzania and explored whether this relationship was modified by parity. This inequity may compound the burden of greater mortality among the poorest women and their babies. Records for 4456 rural women from the 2015–16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey with a live birth in the preceding 5 years were examined. Proportions of births at each location (home/PHC/hospital) were calculated by demographic and obstetric characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios of home/PHC and hospital/PHC births based on household wealth, including interaction between wealth and parity. Post-estimation margins analysis was applied to estimate childbirth location by wealth and parity. Hospitalbased childbirth uptake was inequitable. The gap between poorest and richest was less pronounced at first birth. Hospital-based care utilization was lowest (around 10%) among the poorest multiparous women, with no increase at high parity (≥5) despite higher risk. PHC-based childbirth care was used by a consistent proportion of women after the first birth (range 30–51%). The poorest women utilized it at intermediate parity, but at parity ≥5 mostly gave birth at home. In an effort to provide effective childbirth care to all women, context-specific strategies are required to improve hospital-based care use, and poor, rural, high parity women are a particularly vulnerable group that requires specific attention. Improving childbirth care in PHC and strengthening referral linkages would benefit a considerable proportion of women. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Health Policy and Planning en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Vol 9;36
dc.subject Obstetrics en_US
dc.subject maternal and child health en_US
dc.subject maternal services en_US
dc.subject equity, primary health care en_US
dc.subject health inequalities en_US
dc.subject poverty en_US
dc.subject rural, hospital en_US
dc.subject health facilities en_US
dc.subject health care utilization en_US
dc.title Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: en_US
dc.title.alternative analysis of the 2015–16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account