dc.contributor.author |
von Both, C. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fleßa, S. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Makuwani, A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mpembeni, R. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Jahn, A. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-02-15T06:06:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-02-15T06:06:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2006 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
von Both, C., Fleβa, S., Makuwani, A., Mpembeni, R., & Jahn, A. (2006). How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 6(1), 22. |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1471-2393-6-22 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
doi:10.1186/1471-2393-6-22 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/459 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Antenatal care (ANC) is a widely used strategy to improve the health of pregnant women and to
encourage skilled care during childbirth. In 2002, the Ministry of Health of the United Republic of Tanzania developed a
national adaptation plan based on the new model of the World Health Organisation (WHO). In this study we assess the
time health workers currently spent on providing ANC services and compare it to the requirements anticipated for the
new ANC model in order to identify the implications of Focused ANC on health care providers' workload.
Methods: Health workers in four dispensaries in Mtwara Urban District, Southern Tanzania, were observed while
providing routine ANC. The time used for the overall activity as well as for the different, specific components of 71 ANC
service provisions was measured in detail; 28 of these were first visits and 43 revisits. Standard time requirements for
the provision of focused ANC were assessed through simulated consultations based on the new guidelines.
Results: The average time health workers currently spend for providing ANC service to a first visit client was found to
be 15 minutes; the provision of ANC according to the focused ANC model was assessed to be 46 minutes. For a
revisiting client the difference between current practise and the anticipated standard of the new model was 27 minutes
(9 vs. 36 min.). The major discrepancy between the two procedures was related to counselling. On average a first visit
client was counselled for 1:30 minutes, while counselling in revisiting clients did hardly take place at all. The simulation
of focused ANC revealed that proper counselling would take about 15 minutes per visit.
Conclusion: While the introduction of focused ANC has the potential to improve the health of pregnant women and
to raise the number of births attended by skilled staff in Tanzania, it may need additional investment in human resources.
The generally anticipated saving effect of the new model through the reduction of routine consultations may not
materialise because the number of consultations is already low in Tanzania with a median of only 4 visits per pregnancy.
Special attention needs to be given to counselling attitudes and skills during the training for Focused ANC as this
component is identified as the major difference between old practise and the new model. Our estimated requirement of
46 minutes per first visit consultation matches well with the WHO estimate of 40 minutes. |
en_GB |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_GB |
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth;6:22 |
|
dc.subject |
antenatal care |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Implications |
en_GB |
dc.subject |
Tanzania |
en_GB |
dc.title |
How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania |
en_GB |
dc.type |
Article |
en_GB |