Laparoscopic total colectomy: Does the indication influence the outcome?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cotte, E.
dc.contributor.author Mohamed, F.
dc.contributor.author Nancey, S.
dc.contributor.author François, Y.
dc.contributor.author Glehen, O.
dc.contributor.author Flourié, B.
dc.contributor.author Saurin, J.C.
dc.contributor.author Poncet, G.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-17T13:45:55Z
dc.date.available 2013-04-17T13:45:55Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 1948-9366
dc.identifier.other doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i11.177.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/844
dc.description.abstract AIM: To assess and compare outcomes of laparoscopic total colectomy performed for a variety of indications. METHODS: Sixty six patients underwent laparoscopic total colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (13) and other diseases (53). Data on demographics, pre- and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 4.5 h. Conversion rate was 13.6%. Total colectomy performed for IBD was associated with a significantly higher anastomotic leak rate (23.1% vs 1.9%, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, hand sewn anastomosis and treatment with more than 20 mg of prednisolone for at least 3 mo was associated with a higher anastomotic leak rate (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in return of gut function and overall morbidity between disease groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total colectomy is feasible and outcomes are equivalent whatever the indication, except for anastomotic leak rate which is higher for patients with IBD. en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries World J Gastrointest Surg 2011 November 27; 3(11): 177-182
dc.subject Laparoscopic en_GB
dc.subject Colectomy en_GB
dc.title Laparoscopic total colectomy: Does the indication influence the outcome? en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account