'How to know what you need to do': a cross-country comparison of maternal health guidelines in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baker, U.
dc.contributor.author Tomson, G.
dc.contributor.author Somé, M.
dc.contributor.author Kouyaté, B.
dc.contributor.author Williams, J.
dc.contributor.author Mpembeni, R.
dc.contributor.author Massawe, S.
dc.contributor.author Blank, A.
dc.contributor.author Gustafsson, L.L.
dc.contributor.author Eriksen, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-22T06:56:15Z
dc.date.available 2013-04-22T06:56:15Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Baker, U., Tomson, G., Somé, M., Kouyaté, B., Williams, J., Mpembeni, R., ... & Eriksen, J. (2012). How to know what you need to do': a cross-country comparison of maternal health guidelines in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. Implement Sci, 7(1), 31.
dc.identifier.other doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-31.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/911
dc.description.abstract Background: Initiatives to raise the quality of care provided to mothers need to be given priority in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). The promotion of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is a common strategy, but their implementation is often challenging, limiting their potential impact. Through a cross-country perspective, this study explored CPGs for maternal health in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Tanzania. The objectives were to compare factors related to CPG use including their content compared with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, their format, and their development processes. Perceptions of their availability and use in practice were also explored. The overall purpose was to further the understanding of how to increase CPGs’ potential to improve quality of care for mothers in SSA. Methods: The study was a multiple case study design consisting of cross-country comparisons using document review and key informant interviews. A conceptual framework to aid analysis and discussion of results was developed, including selected domains related to guidelines’ implementability and use by health workers in practice in terms of usability, applicability, and adaptability. Results: The study revealed few significant differences in content between the national guidelines for maternal health and WHO recommendations. There were, however, marked variations in the format of CPGs between the three countries. Apart from the Ghanaian and one of the Tanzanian CPGs, the levels of both usability and applicability were assessed as low or medium. In all three countries, the use of CPGs by health workers in practice was perceived to be limited. Conclusion: Our cross-country study suggests that it is not poor quality of content or lack of evidence base that constitute the major barrier for CPGs to positively impact on quality improvement in maternal care in SSA. It rather emphasises the need to prioritise the format of guidelines to increase their usability and applicability and to consider these attributes together with implementation strategies as integral to their development processes. en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofseries Implementation Science ;7:31
dc.subject CPGs en_GB
dc.subject Health service delivery, en_GB
dc.subject Information and communication technology (ICT), en_GB
dc.subject Implementation en_GB
dc.subject Maternal health, en_GB
dc.subject Quality improvement, en_GB
dc.subject WHO en_GB
dc.subject Sub Saharan Africa, en_GB
dc.title 'How to know what you need to do': a cross-country comparison of maternal health guidelines in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania. en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MUHAS IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account