Application of basic pharmacology and dispensing practice of antibiotics in accredited drug-dispensing outlets in Tanzania

dc.contributor.authorMinzi, O. M.
dc.contributor.authorManyilizu, V. S.
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-25T07:15:49Z
dc.date.available2015-08-25T07:15:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBackground: Provision of pharmaceutical services in accredited drug-dispensing outlets (ADDOs) in Tanzania has not been reported. This study compared the antibiotics dispensing practice between ADDOs and part II shops, or duka la dawa baridi (DLDBs), in Tanzania. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study that was conducted in ADDOs and DLDBs. A simulated client method for data collection was used, and a total of 85 ADDOs, located in Mvomero, Kilombero, and Morogoro rural districts, were compared with 60 DLDBs located in Kibaha district. The research assistants posed as simulated clients and requested to buy antibiotics from ADDOs and DLDBs after presenting a case scenario or disease condition. Among the diseases presented were those requiring antibiotics and those usually managed only by oral rehydration salt or analgesics. The simulated clients wanted to know the antibiotics that were available at the shop. The posed questions set a convincing ground to the dispenser either to dispense the antibiotic directly, request a prescription, or refer the patient to a health facility. Proportions were used to summarize categorical variables between ADDOs and DLDBs, and the chi-square test was used to test for statistical difference between the two drug-outlet types in terms of antibiotic-dispensing practice. Results: As many as 40% of trained ADDO dispensers no longer worked at the ADDO shops, so some of the shops employed untrained staff. A larger proportion of ADDOs than DLDBs dispensed antibiotics without prescriptions (P = 0.004). The overall results indicate that there was no difference between the two types of shops in terms of adhering to regulations for dispensing antibiotics. However, in some circumstances, eg, antibiotic sale without prescription and no referral made, for complicated cases, ADDOs performed worse than DLDBs. As many as 30% of DLDBs and 35% of ADDOs dispensed incomplete doses of antibiotics. In both ADDOs and DLDBs, fortified procaine penicillin powder was dispensed as topical application for injuries. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference between ADDOs and DLDBs in the violation of dispensing practice and both ADDOs and DLDBs expressed poor knowledge of the basic pharmacology of antibiotics.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationMinzi, O. M., & Manyilizu, V. S. (2013). Application of basic pharmacology and dispensing practice of antibiotics in accredited drug-dispensing outlets in Tanzania. Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 5, 5.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1594
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherDove Medical Press Ltden_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDrug, healthcare and patient safety, 5, 5.;
dc.subjectAntibiotic-dispensing practiceen_GB
dc.subjectpharmaceutical servicesen_GB
dc.subjectDrug-dispensing outletsen_GB
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_GB
dc.titleApplication of basic pharmacology and dispensing practice of antibiotics in accredited drug-dispensing outlets in Tanzaniaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Omary MS Minzi vs Manyilizu.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: