HIV Surveillance in a Large, Community-Based Study: Results from the Pilot Study of Project Accept (HIV Prevention Trials Network 043)

dc.contributor.authorPiwowar-Manning, E.
dc.contributor.authorFiamma, A.
dc.contributor.authorLaeyendecker, O.
dc.contributor.authorMichal Kulich, M.
dc.contributor.authorDonnell, D.
dc.contributor.authorSzekeres, G.
dc.contributor.authorRobins-Morris, L.
dc.contributor.authorMullis, C.E.
dc.contributor.authorAna Vallari, A.
dc.contributor.authorHackett, J.Jr
dc.contributor.authorMastro, T.D.
dc.contributor.authorGray, G.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, L.
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre, M.W.
dc.contributor.authorChariyalertsak, S.
dc.contributor.authorChingono, A.
dc.contributor.authorSweat, M.
dc.contributor.authorCoates, T.
dc.contributor.authorEshleman, S.H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-06T13:04:23Z
dc.date.available2013-02-06T13:04:23Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: Project Accept is a community randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of community mobilization, mobile testing, same-day results, and post-test support for the prevention of HIV infection in Thailand, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and South Africa. We evaluated the accuracy of in-country HIV rapid testing and determined HIV prevalence in the Project Accept pilot study. Methods: Two HIV rapid tests were performed in parallel in local laboratories. If the first two rapid tests were discordant (one reactive, one non-reactive), a third HIV rapid test or enzyme immunoassay was performed. Samples were designated HIV NEG if the first two tests were non-reactive, HIV DISC if the first two tests were discordant, and HIV POS if the first two tests were reactive. Samples were re-analyzed in the United States using a panel of laboratory tests. Results: HIV infection status was correctly determined based on-in country testing for 2,236 (99.5%) of 2,247 participants [7 (0.37%) of 1,907 HIV NEG samples were HIV-positive; 2 (0.63%) of 317 HIV POS samples were HIV-negative; 2 (8.3%) of 24 HIV DISC samples were incorrectly identified as HIV-positive based on the in-country tie-breaker test]. HIV prevalence was: Thailand: 0.6%, Tanzania: 5.0%, Zimbabwe 14.7%, Soweto South Africa: 19.4%, Vulindlela, South Africa: 24.4%, (overall prevalence: 14.4%). Conclusions: In-country testing based on two HIV rapid tests correctly identified the HIV infection status for 99.5% of study participants; most participants with discordant HIV rapid tests were not infected. HIV prevalence varied considerably across the study sites (range: 0.6% to 24.4%).en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334-11-251
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/175
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Infectious Diseases 2011, 11:251
dc.subjectHIVen_GB
dc.subjectSurveillanceen_GB
dc.titleHIV Surveillance in a Large, Community-Based Study: Results from the Pilot Study of Project Accept (HIV Prevention Trials Network 043)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1471-2334-11-251.pdf
Size:
209.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: