A pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate local gentamicin versus saline in open tibial fractures (pGO-Tibia)
| dc.contributor.author | Haonga, B.T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ngunyale, P | |
| dc.contributor.author | von Kaeppler, E.P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Donnelley, C. A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Won, N. Y | |
| dc.contributor.author | Elieze, E. N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brown, K | |
| dc.contributor.author | Flores, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | O’Marr, J. M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodarte, P | |
| dc.contributor.author | Urva, M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cortez, A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Porco, T | |
| dc.contributor.author | Morshed, S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shearer, D. W | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-21T12:26:25Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-21T12:26:25Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Open tibial fractures have a high risk of infection that can lead to severe morbidity. Antibiotics administered locally at the site of the open wound are a potentially effective preventive measure, but there are limited data evaluating aminoglycoside antibiotics. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the efficacy of local gentamicin in reducing the risk of fracture-related infection after open tibial fracture. Methods: This study is a single-center, pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute. Participants were randomized intraoperatively after wound closure to receive gentamicin solution or normal saline solution injected at the fracture site. Follow-ups were completed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The primary feasibility outcomes were the rate of enrollment and retention. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of fracturerelated infection. Results: Of 199 patients screened, 100 eligible patients were successfully enrolled and randomized over 9 months (11.1 patients/ month). Complete data were recorded at baseline and follow-up for .95% of cases. The rate of follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year were 70%, 68%, 69%, 61%, and 80%, respectively. There was no difference in adverse events or any of the measured primary and secondary outcomes. Conclusion: This pilot study is among the first to evaluate locally administered gentamicin in open tibial fractures. Results indicate a rigorous clinical trial with acceptable rates of enrollment and follow-up to address this topic is possible in this setting | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3243 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | OTA International | en_US |
| dc.subject | fracture related infection | en_US |
| dc.subject | open tibia fracture | en_US |
| dc.subject | local antibiotics | en_US |
| dc.title | A pilot, masked, randomized controlled trial to evaluate local gentamicin versus saline in open tibial fractures (pGO-Tibia) | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
