Comparative Performance of Line Probe Assay and GeneXpert in the Detection of Rifampicin Monoresistance in a TB-Endemic African Country

dc.contributor.authorMchaki, B.R.
dc.contributor.authorMgaya, F.X.
dc.contributor.authorKunambi, P.P.
dc.contributor.authorHang’ombe, B.
dc.contributor.authorMatee, M.I.
dc.contributor.authorMunyeme, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T11:59:46Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T11:59:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractRapid, accurate and reliable assays are required for timely detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis and early initiation of second-line TB treatment as well as to minimize transmission of resistant strains. This study assessed diagnostic performance characteristics of two rapid molecular assays, line probe assay (LPA) and GeneXpert (MTB/RIF), in the detection rifampicin monoresistance using the phenotypic proportion method on Lowenstein–Jensen media as the gold standard. This study involved a total of 357 isolates, 74 rifampicin-resistant and 283 rifampicin-susceptible, collected at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (CTRL) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, between 2016 and 2019. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were used to assess the performance characteristics of the two assays while kappa coefficient was used to determine agreement of test results. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to determine the discriminatory ability of the test in distinguishing resistant and susceptible TB isolates. Our results showed that GeneXpert had sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 93.2, 82.7, 58.5 and 97.9%, respectively; the corresponding performance for LPA was 86.5, 97.5, 90.1 and 96.5%, respectively. Compared with conventional phenotypic DST results, GeneXpert had a moderate agreement (kappa 0.621, p < 0.001), while LPA had high agreement (0.853, p < 0.001). LPA showed an accuracy of 95.2% compared to GeneXpert’s 84.9%. ROC curve depicted the ability of the tests to distinguish rifampicin-sensitive and rifampicin-resistant strains to be 87.9% for GeneXpert and 92.0% for LPA. Our results indicate the superiority of LPA over GeneXpert regarding detection of rifampicin monoresistance. However, logistic challenges such as longer turnaround time and need for skilled laboratory personnel may limit its use.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMchaki, B.R., Mgaya, F.X., Kunambi, P.P., Hang’ombe, B., Matee, M.I. and Munyeme, M., 2022. Comparative Performance of Line Probe Assay and GeneXpert in the Detection of Rifampicin Monoresistance in a TB-Endemic African Country. Antibiotics, 11(11), p.1489.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111489
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.muhas.ac.tz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3025
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAntibiotics;11(11), p.1489.
dc.subjectDiagnostic accuracyen_US
dc.subjectGeneXperten_US
dc.subjectLine probe assayen_US
dc.subjectRifampicinen_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.subjectResistanceen_US
dc.titleComparative Performance of Line Probe Assay and GeneXpert in the Detection of Rifampicin Monoresistance in a TB-Endemic African Countryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mgaya et al 2022.pdf
Size:
875.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.63 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: