Laparoscopic total colectomy: Does the indication influence the outcome?
| dc.contributor.author | Cotte, E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mohamed, F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nancey, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | François, Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Glehen, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Flourié, B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saurin, J.C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poncet, G. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-17T13:45:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-04-17T13:45:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | AIM: To assess and compare outcomes of laparoscopic total colectomy performed for a variety of indications. METHODS: Sixty six patients underwent laparoscopic total colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (13) and other diseases (53). Data on demographics, pre- and post-operative outcomes were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 4.5 h. Conversion rate was 13.6%. Total colectomy performed for IBD was associated with a significantly higher anastomotic leak rate (23.1% vs 1.9%, P < 0.05). On univariate analysis, hand sewn anastomosis and treatment with more than 20 mg of prednisolone for at least 3 mo was associated with a higher anastomotic leak rate (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in return of gut function and overall morbidity between disease groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic total colectomy is feasible and outcomes are equivalent whatever the indication, except for anastomotic leak rate which is higher for patients with IBD. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1948-9366 | |
| dc.identifier.other | doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i11.177. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/844 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | World J Gastrointest Surg 2011 November 27; 3(11): 177-182 | |
| dc.subject | Laparoscopic | en_GB |
| dc.subject | Colectomy | en_GB |
| dc.title | Laparoscopic total colectomy: Does the indication influence the outcome? | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
